Free Spirits

As we gallivanted around East Berlin, Hendrika rattled on about life on her commune in southern Holland. She talked of being a “free spirit,” and I soon realized that the Dutch translation meant “also does animals.” She bragged of frolicking with any and all types of mammals with no reservations or prejudices. She was the first person I met who viewed anthrax as a sexually-transmitted disease. (And no, I didn’t.)

James Bovard, My First Time to East Berlin

The focus of the article is on the stultifying oppression of East Berlin, and not on the perversions of a young Dutch lesbian. Fair enough, as the woman is just destroying herself, not hundreds of millions.

Still, I presume that Bovard never did reproof the foolish woman. After all, this is in 1977, where Europe (and, trotting behind, America) had recently given up their play-pretend Christian faith.

There was little Christian faith left in the public sphere in 1965, so there was little resistance, and that came more from a “conservative” disdain for the “bad behavior” and impertinence of the rebels than from principled objections. When rebels asked “Why should we …?” conservatives could only respond with “How dare you …” They were comfortable with the way things were; the generation of the 1960s was not.

The problems that seemed to come out of nowhere in the 1960s were merely manifestations of the shift from Christianity to humanism, the faith in the pre-eminence of man, the only possible conclusion one can derive from Darwin’s biological scheme. The student rebels and those who sided with them understood the implications of their Darwinian educations.

The rebellion of the 1960s (and Darwin himself) was a manifestation of man’s desire to make good on Satan’s promise that men could “be as gods, knowing good and evil” (Gen. 3:5). Humanism is the philosophical embodiment of that desire to be as gods, to supplant the authority of God with man’s. Western culture had been living on a borrowed Christian worldview and ethic. There was an intelligent, if perverse, consistency in the rebels that was lacking in the conservative element of society; the latter was coasting and merely wanted the ride to continue.

The Importance of Christian Reconstruction By Mark R. Rushdoony

This shift from retaining the dead shells of Christianity to a full-orbed atheism definitely enveloped the oh-so-Calvinist Netherlands. Recognizing this, it is hardly a surprise that the Dutch were the first to go for State-backed homosexual marriages in 2001.

(Although I distinctly seem to remember something going on in 1992, I can’t prove it.)

The 2015 Eurobarometer found that 91% of the Dutch population thought that same-sex marriage should be allowed throughout Europe, 7% were against.[44]

Wikipedia, Same-sex marriage in the Netherlands

Cringing Before the Masters

Europe leads, America follows.

To the extent that this is not true, is tied to actual living churches in the United States. And, by and large, they have no real hope for victory, look endlessly for an escape from reality, and are so very confident that Satan, not Christ, rules the world.

(Remember: Christ rewards His people for their faith… and also gives suitable wages for their faithlessness. “Who you fear is who you worship.”)

Christ speaks to those who have a future, not those who kill it.

Christ insists that God is the God of the Living, and NOT the God of the Dead.
(Walking or otherwise.)

Christ demands that we leave the dead to bury the dead.

“But Europe is the centre of civilization! Cultural cringe is absolutely demanded of us! We must respect the ancestors!”

Churches that place powerful men above God cringe and fear before their contemptuous enemies.

I refuse to follow their example… of the example of the whitewashed sepulchers of Europe.

Better to send missionaries to Rotterdam, where Christian converts from Islam are willing to display the spine and guts that limp-wristed European pseudo-believers loathe.

“Challenge the consensus? That might put my job and comfort at risk! NEVER!”

The future rides with those poor-but-faithful African/Near East converts, and not with the overwhelmingly worthless European clergy.

You are the salt of the earth, but if salt has lost its taste, how shall its saltiness be restored? It is no longer good for anything except to be thrown out and trampled under people’s feet.

Matthew 5:13, ESV

The Rule of Law

There can be no actual Christian culture without Christian law, as inscribed in our hearts by the Holy Spirit, and described by Moses (and modified by Christ). Without a God-given legal structure, there can be no Christian society. “The Source of the Law is the God of the society.”

The pagans appeal to Roman and Greek Law, even though Greek legal codes despised the foreigner and the non-citizen of a city, and Roman laws exists to strengthen the Roman State, while the lower classes were to be kept ignorant of the law. Hayek, being a good Darwinian atheist, mysteriously neglected to mention this.

Moses, as directed by God, though very differently, having the Law spelled out publicly for all, insisting that the foreigner be under the protection of the Law, and making sure that the Law is defined by God, and not powerful and wealthy men.

Now, Hayek and I both agree that socialists HATE equality under the law, seeing it as a tool to benefit assorted favored minorities, with those minorities serving as symbols of Elite Power.

With the Socialists being the Ruling Elites, of course.

….Amazon/IMDb justified that effort, and those expenses, [to reveal the real age of actresses] by repeatedly citing their unbreakable rule: “We never remove factually correct personal information for any reason.”

Unless you’re a tranny.

[…]

Last week’s column was about how the left is willing to sacrifice feminists to the tranny agenda, because the tranny agenda represents an all-out assault on the very notion of “normal,” and destroying normal is what the left wants more than anything. Amazon surely understands the importance of trannyism to the left, and the path of least resistance was to cave to the trannies’ demands.

But to those who’ve made the annihilation of normal their singular goal, the decision by Amazon/IMDb represents more than just another instance of tranny favoritism. Amazon/IMDb has aped Wikipedia, which also has a policy that allows trannies to erase the history of their former selves. Wikipedia and IMDb are supposed to be encyclopedias, archives, reference works. They’re supposed to document and preserve data for the historical record. But whereas Wikipedia’s ideological biases are well-known and inevitable due to the site’s decentralized, “communal” nature (which ensures that the loudest and most fanatical trolls—I mean “editors”—prevail), IMDb is centrally controlled, and by a corporation that wields enormous power and influence.

And now Amazon has used that power and influence to facilitate the erasing of history. Not only is any man who says he’s a woman magically a woman, but any record of his life as a man is to be erased, even on sites that were designed to coldly and objectively record facts.

The tranny cult isn’t just about warping present-day reality; it’s also about erasing the past. It’s about forcing us to believe not only that a man in a dress is a woman, but that he’s always been one.

Gaslighting us Terminator-style by going back in time to erase the inconvenient past of people who have decided to “reinvent” as someone else.

“The devil’s finest trick is to persuade you that he does not exist.”

And that he never did.

T(y)ranny Triumphant, Part II: Zhe Who Controls the Past… by David Cole

But of course, Atheistic Ruling Classes – from the judges, to the academics, to the politicians, to philosophers from Aristotle and Plato, to Kant, Hobbes and Neitzche — never really believed in law or objective reality.

Just in power.

And in the right of Powerful Men — and their favoured toys & tools — to rewrite history and reality to suit themselves.

(So say goodby to the feminists, who have outlived their usefulness, and welcome to their new useful tools.

“The working classes? Never heard of them!”)

Yesterday’s Giants, Today’s Dwarves

Now, with the public death of Mighty Marxist collectivism (see the fate of East Berlin), we can now turn to today’s half-pint enemies of God, as illustrated by the “does animals too” young Dutch woman of 1977.

(That woman is now a pensioner in her 60s, and her generation is the Ruling Establishment, happily building on the solid foundations laid by her own forebearers.)

The God-haters have fallen from killing millions by organizing artificial famines and joyfully shooting believers in the head, to killing millions by carving up the helpless unborn children of God-hating families… and so destroying their own future.

Pathetic.

First, let me point out why these delusional power-seekers triumph over God’s people:

  1. the solid majority of Christians absolutely hate God’s law, and prefer to be ruled by anything else.
    1. “Shut up God! Just.. Just SHUT UP!”
  2. the money and the supposed safety of towing the Establishment Line.
  3. the deep faithlessness of Christian clergy, dutifully followed by the ever-shrinking band of Christian laymen.

Second, God said that what the church loosed on earth will be loosed in heaven: not permanently if they choose evil, but for a while. And I am confident that bestiality is a lot more common in the oh-so-conservative Dutch countryside than in the urban centres, even today.

No hard evidence, by the way. Only logic and inference… and analysis of the lack of cultural fruits and spiritual power of those supposed Deeply Conservative God Fearers.

“People who obey God and exalt Him above all have great power, and are hated by the God haters. So where is the spiritual power of the Dutch Calvinists? And why aren’t their supposed ‘enemies’ persecuting them, like in the Communist states, or the Islamic world?

There is a certain dog that isn’t barking…
…and I think I know why.”

God is not mocked, and the secret evil that is done will be hauled out in the open, for all to see.

Third, let me correct an error I made: “solid foundations” should be “sandy foundations.” The Dutch don’t really care that their welfare state is doomed, and that their culture is going to be washed away in the future, so long as welfare paychecks and creature comforts keep flowing today.

Just ask any aging Dutch lesbian.

When one of those who reclined at table with him heard these things, he said to him, “Blessed is everyone who will eat bread in the kingdom of God!” But he said to him, “A man once gave a great banquet and invited many. And at the time for the banquet he sent his servant to say to those who had been invited, ‘Come, for everything is now ready.’ But they all alike began to make excuses. The first said to him, ‘I have bought a field, and I must go out and see it. Please have me excused.’ And another said, ‘I have bought five yoke of oxen, and I go to examine them. Please have me excused.’ And another said, ‘I have married a wife, and therefore I cannot come.’ So the servant came and reported these things to his master. Then the master of the house became angry and said to his servant, ‘Go out quickly to the streets and lanes of the city, and bring in the poor and crippled and blind and lame.’ And the servant said, ‘Sir, what you commanded has been done, and still there is room.’ And the master said to the servant, ‘Go out to the highways and hedges and compel people to come in, that my house may be filled. For I tell you, none of those men who were invited shall taste my banquet.’”

Luke 14:15-24, English Standard Version

I think we all know those faithless Dutch Calvinists who were initially invited to the banquet, and the Arab and Black Christians who will be taking their place.

For God is the Lord of the Living.

And not of the Dead.

Noble Travellers

Yes, the Dutch are pagans. But on occasion, Christians can still learn from them.

“Don’t just hear. Listen.”

Christ, King of Heaven and Earth, said that He did not come to be served, but to serve.

Go forth, and do likewise.

The Monstrous Regiment, The Transformed Wife, and Marital Rape

The Monstrous Regiment recently produced a podcast (also available here) on The Transformed Wife and its recent ‘justification’ of marital rape.

Yes, its insane that numerous Christian women back the Transformed Wife and its support of marital rape. Then again, there are many feminists that have their own insane views on why bearded six-foot men can walk into women’s washrooms, if he merely says that he’s a woman.

Women are far too willing to knuckle under forceful men.

But frankly, Christians should know better: God stands with the weak, not the strong. The abused, not the abuser.

Granted, said woman can forgive her husband if she chooses. (Due to power differentials, I would be quite suspicious of such ‘forgiveness’ myself.) Even so, you forgive someone because they did something wrong.

Imagine There is no Hell, a.k.a. Love and Tolerance

Imagine there’s no heaven
It’s easy if you try
No hell below us
Above us, only sky
Imagine all the people living for today
Ah
Imagine there’s no countries
It isn’t hard to do
Nothing to kill or die for
And no religion too
Imagine all the people living life in peace

John Lennon, “Imagine”

“Welll… perhaps not all the people. Something will have to be done about those bigoted hateful Christians, after all.”

“Direct extermination has its charms. But there are other means of achieving the same ends that have better optics. And, I dare say, a better chance of comprehensive success.”

Wherever you have hell dropping out of a church, you have coexistence with evil being preached.

You have the new morality: you have every kind of doctrine justifying evil and parading as love and tolerance.

But these doctrines of love and tolerance and co-existence have a hatred of justice and of God. And they are simply ways of saying “Grant us equal rights to live with you so that we may then destroy you and deny your right to live.”

A century ago Henry Storrs observed “when hell drops out of religion justice drops out of politics.”

R. J.Rushdoony, “Hell and Politics”

Ah, back when the Established Order was called “the new morality”.

“When I am weaker than you, I ask you for freedom because that is according to your principles; when I am stronger than you, I take away your freedom because that is according to my principles.”

Frank Herbert, Children of Dune

“I wonder if those Christian will ever learn.”

“Not the oldsters, who merely want to go along to get along. Most of the youngsters won’t care, and simply abandon their religion and shift to the winning side. Due to the desire for consequence-free sex, a need to get ahead, or despair of always and forever losing the culture wars.”

“There is always a remnant.”

“An irrelevant remnant. An irritant, not a threat, that can be dealt with at leisure.”


The time has come for Christians to be more than an irritant. To have faith in Christ, to be willing to sacrifice for the expansion of His Kingdom in this life, in time and on earth.

To be believers in God’s justice. To believe in Hell, as well as in Heaven. And to make this commitment count, with real prices paid, real rewards gained, and real and substantial impacts in your community in this life as well as the life to come.

Very soon afterwards, Christians will cease to be a source of amusement, or a mere irritant. They will become a threat to the Order, that will have to be dealt with firmly.

This is when you decide to either fear (and worship) God, or fear (and worship) Powerful Men.

I advise you to fear God, who will crush His enemies in time and on earth, as well as in Hell and the Lake of Fire.

The End of Evangelical America

This man has some good ideas, when it comes to living in today’s society which is increasingly devoid of Christian knowledge and assumptions.

The blurb from Dickerson’s book:

In 2006, few Americans were expecting the economy to collapse. Today the American church is in a similar position, on the precipice of a great spiritual recession. While we focus on a few large churches and dynamic leaders that are successful, the church’s overall membership is shrinking. Young Christians are fleeing. Our donations are drying up. Political fervor is dividing us. Even as these crises eat at the church internally, our once friendly host culture is quickly turning hostile and antagonistic. How can we avoid a devastating collapse?

Note that of 2013, evangelical Christians made up 7% of the American population, and is set to further shrink drastically. At a pure guess, I assume that it will level off to about 2-3% in the 2030s-2040s, around the time the welfare state collapses. A slow disintegration into nothingness will conclude the program.

Perhaps a generation after the welfare state dies, some new variant of the Christian church will rise to shape the future. It will have little or nothing to do with the current conservative denominations, which will be effectively as dead as the Church of England.

And no, these conservative denominations don’t have the slightest idea on what to do. Besides Vote Republican, and get ready for the Rapture.

*snort*

The author of the book is wiser than this:

The book’s second part, which Dickerson identifies as most important, is strong. It is marked by love for the church, confidence in God’s Word, and solid pastoral instincts. Each chapter suggests adjusted ministry priorities to match each area of decline.

For example, these chapters call us to do good to those outsiders who hate us, and to rally insiders around the authority of the Bible and the content of the gospel. Dickerson suggests ministry models less dependent on paid staff and costly programs than on a growing network of disciple-making lay leaders. He calls pastors to emphasize individual shepherding as a way to stop the drift away from churches. And he proposes evangelistic methods less focused on events and headline evangelists than on “normal” Christians confidently sharing their faith.

I wouldn’t call these strategies “bold” and “fresh” in the way the author claims, but “bold” and “fresh” are overrated. But these simple methods reflect biblical priorities and come supported by centuries of fruitful precedent. They are tried and true, and that should be reason enough to get excited about them.

Book Review: The Great Evangelical Recession, by John Dickerson

I would add a ditching of the denominational bureaucracies, a renewed emphasis on home churches, and a return to serious charitable giving and assistance to the poor, the widow, and the orphan. Not just charity, but face-to-face interaction in job training, basic entrepreneurial work – “better to learn to fish, than merely beg for fish” – and in conveying life skills.

Remember: church growth crashes when a physical church building is raised up. When hard-core Actual Evangelicals — a.k.a. people who put evangelizing their location above raising pyramids — decide to forget new church buildings in favour for more opioid recovery programs, then the church’s future will get a lot more brighter.

And not a second before.

Thanks for the tip-off regarding the book and the video, Gary North.


In the same vein, I have read a good article from Joseph Foreman today.

Brings 5 ideas together:

1. For all practical purposes the two major obstacles to recreational sex, pregnancy and disease, have been removed.

2. Sexual ethics and much of the social structure adopted to support it are now found unnecessary and oppressive to women in particular who are “freed” from these biological consequences.

3. Labor is increasingly tied to intellectual judgement and freed from physical strength, to produce fruit and personal physical warfare to defend its fruit.

4. If traditional morality is to survive it must demonstrate a positive contribution of God’s Law concerning sex and covenant to the freedom men and women both have from the negative consequences of sexuality and the new possibilities for human growth and development if God’s Law continues to shape society.

5. This fruitful possibility is found not in protection from the negative threat but in the positive development of the Biblical Theological purpose of the creation order as it is restored and Christian society frees itself from the curse that has plagued the Gentiles since God’s Law was first rejected and shows what fruitfulness can be in a world governed the only way it can be which is by God’s law ruling each heart freely. It is this vision of the future we must recover for our Children.

Without the Biblical Concept of “The Future” There is Only Sex, by Joseph Foreman

You have to have a vision of a Christian future, covering the world, if you are going to welcome children, as opposed to just welcoming pleasure.

You have to be willing to sacrifice to get that future. That takes commitment, a willingness to sacrifice and pay a serious, costly price for victory… something that is distinctly lacking in the Western Christian church today.

Joseph Foreman understands why there is this lack of commitment (and therefore victory) in the church: few Western Christians actually believe that the expansion of the Kingdom of God – in time and earth – is possible… or even desirable.

It’s as if Jesus Christ hasn’t said anything at all.

(Much to the secret delight of not merely atheists, but a huge number, probably the solid majority, of the churchmen. It was the Men of the Cloth who came up with this faithless bit of spiritual cowardice to justify their fear/worship/submission to powerful men, after all.)

Scripture sees our Children as God’s arrows to be released with deadly targeting and intent into the heart of God’s enemies in our culture, in our civilization, in our nation and its politics; Arrows who transform from the heart of all whom they strike.  God’s design is for us to never be contented with external conformity, but always from our heart, to strike deep into the heart of all we are and know transforming God’s enemies into His friends and showing them how to transform their culture into His Kingdom.

It is that future, embraced by God’s people since Eden, that we have taken away from the Church for the last 200 years. We have tried to argue against evolution, and against modernity and post modernity. We have tried to argue for God’s Law, God’s Grace, we have tried to argue for modesty, chastity, freedom, love and toleration and for Biblical Government, We have argued for His sovereign majesty and purpose in all of life, but if anything, our arguments have become more and more irrelevant to modern ears. And we find many Biblical themes such as discipleship, love, care for the helpless taken over by those who represent the spirit of our age as if they are the authors of grace, freedom and ethics. And they use the goodness of these concepts to lure our culture into thinking that it is government that can provide these things and that Christians are haters.

What went wrong?

Starting 200 years ago, we stripped the Truth of God’s word out of the framework of Time and History. It seemed like a spiritual thing to do. It became widely accepted that the end of the world, the rapture and tribulation were at hand and Jesus would soon come to end history and set up his kingdom after burning the world and history as we know it to cinders. In other words, the Church abandoned, mocked, derided a concept of the future in space time history as it began in the Garden.

At the same time, Christians abandoned God’s vision for the Future, the unbelieving world added to their concept of the supremacy of Man, the very vision of Time and History and the Future that the Church so carelessly discarded. They began to argue and live as if their future of a One World Human race united by raw Government power that would meet every need by force and would forbid all alternative ideas and ministries to meet all needs was inevitable and Good.

Without the Biblical Concept of “The Future” There is Only Sex, by Joseph Foreman

The Men of the Cloth — and A LOT of their rapidly aging congregations — only wish to be completely irrelevant to the culture, and thus safe from any public hostility or danger to their job, positions, public standing, or pensions.

They have been granted their heart’s desire.

I advise you not to join them, though. See Matthew 28 (the man who hid his talent) and Luke 12…

And that servant who knew his master’s will but did not get ready or act according to his will, will receive a severe beating. But the one who did not know, and did what deserved a beating, will receive a light beating. Everyone to whom much was given, of him much will be required, and from him to whom they entrusted much, they will demand the more.

Luke 12:47-48, English Standard Version

Note that in both situations, God is punishing His people for their faithlessness, and not unbelievers, outsiders, pagans, or atheists. God holds His people to a higher standard than He expects from his enemies!

In the past Nature had natural barriers to profligate behavior. Women could get pregnant, Men and women could get diseases.

The whole neighborhood knew not only you but your great, great grandparents some of whom were still alive and cared for in your home.

There was no place to go and no way to get there anyway.

It is really easy in that environment to believe that Nature and Nature’s God would back up impersonal morality by being in everyone’s business and punishing people and forcing conformity knowing that disease, pregnancy and shaming would get the sinner in the end. So Christian morality made sense. . . as an impersonal set of rules that parents, neighbors and governments like Church imposed on others.

We now have a generation that is not only free of those natural world or natural law restraints, you have to be my age to even remember a time when the last vestiges of these restraints even existed.

In that same time your children have been thoroughly educated by a government system that has insisted that sexuality is a recreational joy to be done as often as you can enjoyably do it by consent.

Every kind of sexual activity is on every child’s telephone and accessible to them 24/7 . . . Oh you have porn blockers on their phone? You home School? Christian School? Their friends don’t.

The government schools are actively recruiting children to accept and experiment with bisexuality and homosexuality.

I want to stop here. Everything I have stated is environmental. That is, it is all around us. It is the parameter of our possible actions.

The natural reinforcements to an externally imposed Christian morality have been removed.

I do not believe they can be reimposed.

But more than that, I don’t think that what Jesus came to do was to establish a world where morality was enforced from the top.

Without the Biblical Concept of “The Future” There is Only Sex, by Joseph Foreman

I have a minor quibble with Foreman: the money that the Establishment uses to promote perversion, evil, and sterility will fall away. God does not prosper the wicked for long: soon enough, they become as impoverished as the rest of the Walking Dead.

But that’s a minor quibble. Even after the money is gone, the evil in men’s hearts will remain, merely taking a different godless form.

(Maybe. It is possible that Western Culture will simply remain sterile and wildly delusional, sticking with the devils it knows until it goes extinct.)

Whether it is infected with new ‘conservative’ evils, or sticks with the old ‘progressive’ evils the Intellectual Class is currently pushing, the wickedness will remain until it is driven out by the Holy Spirit. And that is only going to happen when Godly people decide that the Kingdom of God must expand on this earth, in our lifetimes, as Jesus Christ commanded.

I also agree with Foreman that the old “natural law” restrictions that punished fornication are largely gone for good.

Except for the sterility and the no future bit, tied to childlessness.

God’s people should desire to expand God’s Kingdom, right now and into the future.

And raising Godly children are a big part of that.

Amputations Among the Mentally Ill

From WND:

The statement from Dr. Michelle Cretella, the executive director of the American College of Pediatricians, came in a 2017 Daily Signal video.

In the video, she addressed the mental health aspect of transgenderism.

“See, if you want to cut off a leg or an arm, you’re mentally ill, but if you want to cut off healthy breasts or a penis, you’re transgender,” she stated in the video.

“We define transability [also known as body integrity identity disorder] as the desire or the need for a person identified as able-bodied by other people to transform his or her body to obtain a physical impairment,” Alexandre Baril, a Quebec-born academic knowledgeable on the transabled community explained to Canada’s National Post. “The person could want to become deaf, blind, amputee, paraplegic. It’s a really, really strong desire.”

But pointing out the double standard regarding transgenderism, Trinko explained, is “a sentence YouTube will not allow the doctor to say about children and gender identity issues.”

Cretella explained in the video — a transcript is available here — that wanting a healthy limb amputated is considered a mental disorder.

“If I were to say, ‘Doc, I am suicidal because I’m an amputee trapped in a normal body, please cut off my leg,’ I will be diagnosed with body identity integrity disorder. But if I walk into that doctor’s office and say, ‘I am a man, sign me up for a double mastectomy,’ my physician will. See, if you want to cut off a leg or an arm you’re mentally ill, but if you want to cut off healthy breasts or a penis, you’re transgender.

“No one is born transgender. If gender identity were hardwired in the brain before birth, identical twins would have the same gender identity 100 percent of the time. But they don’t,” she said.

Such censorship, Trinko wrote, “should horrify every YouTube user – and anyone who values the importance of a public square featuring a variety of perspectives.”

“We agree with the spirit behind YouTube’s hate speech policy, which states, ‘Hate speech is not allowed on YouTube. We remove content promoting violence or hatred against individuals or groups based on any of the following attributes’ including ‘Gender Identity and Expression’ and ‘Sex/Gender.’ We believe transgender individuals, and any individual struggling with gender identity issues, should be treated with love and respect.

“But we also believe that on a topic where medical treatments have such serious ramifications, from infertility to permanent alteration of body parts, it is worth having a robust, fact-driven discussion,” she wrote.

That’s the thing with these Kantian atheists that run the West.

Despite all the blather about “science” and “facts” and “material reality”, they never really cared about science, or facts, or material reality.

They just cared about power.

They saw that God has absolute power, and that Christians routinely used their power to stop atheists from their lawless behaviour, and so our resentful intellectual class

  1. hated the power of God and His people
  2. wanted that power for themselves: “What I say, is reality!”

Of course, not being God, they have to use the State as their God-substitute. “Kneel and Obey, because we control the guns and the money and the media!”

That pseudo-deity, the State, that is going to prove to be a very poor substitute for the Real Deal.

Idols always are.

Song of Abel

There are hard consequences for the death of our Abels – for Whites and Blacks in America and Europe, Chinese in Europe, East Indians in India…

As for the feminists who acted as good progressive cat’s paws for this slaughter – utterly uncaring of the sexually skewed slaughter that abortion leads to…

(“Ummm…. just how demonic are these
pro-woman feminists
anyways?”

“Just keep reading.”)

…the patriarchy, an intensely godless institution, despite the occasional pious pose, has prepared a very special reward just for YOU.

See Bojidar Marinov’s epic article Patriarchy and Sodomy for more.