Science Lies

From Uncommon Descent’s At The Scientist: “… who will believe us again?”

—<Quote begins>—

Recently, we mentioned The Scientist’s take on the Surgisphere scandal. A reader writes to draws our attention to a quote from the article:

“Now people are so confused about what science can give you—whether hydroxychloroquine works, it doesn’t work, it’s fake, it’s not fake—that it’s going to be very difficult for us scientists then to use any type of article or publication,” says García. “Now that they know scientists can lie, who will believe us again?”

Catherine Offord, “The Surgisphere Scandal: What Went Wrong?” at The Scientist

Well, no one should believe them, the way people used to, particularly, especially now that Scientific American has endorsed a political candidate (who isn’t even a scientist.)

One gets the feeling that many science boffins don’t “get” what is happening. It won’t be easy to make “Trust the science” mean what it used to.

On the ground, it now means something between “Sign on to this superstition rather than that one.” and “Do what you’re told or else!”

When church services are cancelled but angry political gatherings are not, you have to know that science isn’t driving the process anyway. So our moral and intellectual superiors are not really looking to science for rescue.

If this continues, science will come to be seen as synonymous with the authority to force people to do things, irrelevant to outcome.

The change in the way science is regarded will probably be a slow morph away from the idea that every sensible person trusts science toward the question, “Why are they REALLY saying that?”

A more promising possibility: The Covid scare dies down but people start noticing the same pattern in other areas of science. “Natural selection did it” has the same explanatory value as “God did it.” But natural selection is somehow science and God is not. Why? How?

Some conversations may become possible that were not possible before.

—<Quote ends>—

The scientists will grow more political, more doctrinately leftist-materialist (if possible) and more socially irrelevant, as it becomes obvious that they are merely certified and licensed Establishment mouthpieces, nothing more.

They won’t really care, though, so long as the comfy bureaucratic/academic positions and nice paychecks keep on coming.

Christians are to focus on the truth, as the road to not only win the future, but as the way to please God and gain access to His blessings.

See North’s articles Economics and Moral Courage and On Sacrificing for an Idea for details (no paywall).

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.