A cut-n-paste of Gary North’s article, “Chaos in the Brickyard” Revisited. And my own thoughts at the end.
Fifty years ago today, the most important letter to the editor I ever read appeared in Science.
The letter was on the vast quantity of articles in scholarly journals. Nobody knew what to do with them. The writer called this “chaos in the brickyard.” (Science 142:339, October 18, 1963)
Today, the pile of academic bricks is immensely larger. Nobody knows what to do with them.
Government funding of higher education has caused this. “Publish or perish” has caused this. And remember: this was written before on-line publishing.
It began: “Once upon a time. . . .” Sadly, it is not a fairy tale.
Once upon a time, among the activities and occupations of man there was an activity called scientific research, and the performers of this activity were called scientists. In reality, however, these men were builders who constructed edifices, called explanations or laws, by assembling bricks, called facts. When the bricks were sound and were assembled properly, the edifice was useful and durable and brought pleasure, and sometimes reward, to the builder. If the bricks were faulty or if they were assembled badly, the edifice would crumble, and this kind of disaster could be very dangerous to innocent users of the edifice as well as to the builder, who sometimes was destroyed by the collapse. Because the quality of the bricks was so important to the success of the edifice, and because bricks were so scarce in those days, the builders made their own bricks. The making of bricks was a difficult and expensive undertaking and the wise builder avoided waste by making only bricks of the shape and size necessary for the enterprise at hand. The builder was guided in this manufacture by a blueprint, called a theory or hypothesis.
It came to pass that builders realized that they were sorely hampered in their efforts by delays in obtaining bricks. Thus there arose a new skilled trade known as brickmaking, called junior scientist to give the artisan proper pride in his work. This new arrangement was very efficient, and the construction of edifices proceeded with great vigour. Sometimes brickmakers became inspired and progressed to the status of builders. In spite of the separation of duties, bricks still were made with care and usually were produced only on order. Now and then an enterprising brickmaker was able to foresee a demand and would prepare a stock of bricks ahead of time, but, in general, brickmaking was done on a custom basis because it still was a difficult and expensive process.
And then it came to pass that a misunderstanding spread among the brickmakers (there are some who say that this misunderstanding developed as a result of careless training of a new generation of brickmakers). The brickmakers became obsessed with the making of bricks. When reminded that the ultimate goal was edifices, not bricks, they replied that, if enough bricks were available, the builders would be able to select what was necessary and still continue to construct edifices. The flaws in this argument were not readily apparent, and so, with the help of the citizens who were waiting to use the edifices yet to be built, amazing things happened. The expense of brickmaking became a minor factor because large sums of money were made available; the time and effort involved in brickmaking was reduced by ingenious automatic machinery; the ranks of the brickmakers were swelled by augmented training programs and intensive recruitment. It even was suggested that the production of a suitable number of bricks was equivalent to building an edifice and therefore should entitle the industrious brickmaker to assume the title of builder and, with the title, the authority.
And so it happened that the land became flooded with bricks. it became necessary to organize more and more storage places, called journals, and more and more elaborate systems of bookkeeping to record the inventory. In all of this the brickmakers retained their pride and skill and the bricks were of the very best quality. But production was ahead of demand, and bricks no longer were made to order. The size and shape was now dictated by changing trends in fashion. In order to compete successfully with other brickmakers, production emphasized those types of brick that were easy to make, and only rarely did an adventuresome brickmaker attempt a difficult or unusual design. The influence of tradition in production methods and in types of product became a dominating factor.
Unfortunately, the builders were almost destroyed. It became difficult to find the proper bricks for a task because one had to hunt among so many. It became difficult to find a suitable plot for construction of an edifice because the ground was covered with loose bricks. It became difficult to complete a useful edifice because, as soon as the foundations were discernible, they were buried under an avalanche of random bricks. And, saddest of all, sometimes no effort was made even to maintain the distinction between a pile of bricks and a true edifice.
BERNARD K. FORSCHER
Back in 1963, there was, indeed, a certain amount of pride in making good bricks: “accurate scientific studies”.
That is not true anymore. The goal is to create popular, widely-cited scientific studies which will secure additional funding and a secure reputation. Not accurate scientific studies.
If it is admitted that “science is political,” Why Trust Science? is a very good question indeed.
A bigger question looms: Will frank assertions that science is political, accompanied by a demand for trust, be any good for science? Isn’t this more likely to to be the beginning of a highly politically charged but largely barren period?
We shall see.Science Journalist: Science IS Political!
Somewhere — within the next 40 years I suspect, but certainly before 2100 — another priesthood, this one intensely secular, is going to get shattered.
But even before then, Christians need to get serious about making those high quality bricks, funded privately (no government funding, no publish-or-perish).
We must prove and demonstrate to the public – believing and unbelieving – our right to lead. That means integrity, humility before the Laws of God, and plenty of hard work.
As well as a certain measure of sacrifice. See How Materialism Is Enforced When The Evidence Is Against It for how the political game is played today.
Or, as I’d put it,
In the Before Times,
when the materialists had free government money to play with,
as well as an uncritical mainstream media echo chamber.
Don’t worry about today’s dying Empire.
Work to shape what comes after it.
Work to build the Kingdom of God.
A Kingdom built on truth,
not on popularity,
and not on the Will of Politically Powerful Men.