“My Top 10 media lies”

This post first covers media lies, then Rushdoony, then the One who is Truth.


Media Lies

Michael Goodwin recently published My Top 10 media lies.

I suggest that we start making lists of these lies – lies proven to be lies.

Some can be simple collections of flat-out nonsense on stilts — “man can lawfully marry men” or “abortion isn’t murder” or “things create themselves, given enough time” or “Men are women fi they say they are”. Call them “2 + 2 = 5” lies.

But there are other forms of lies, of the press seeing one thing and promptly reporting another. “The federal government cleared Lafayette Park so Trump could speak” or “Trump made kids in cages.” These kind of lies, pushed by the media, are basically Establishment-backed malicious rumour-mongering.

The media really hate Trump, in or out of office… but their hostility to the former President is not the problem we should be focusing on. The problem is the vigorous promotion of politically useful lies in the service of their hate and fear.

Rushdoony

Now basic to all lying tongues is the unwillingness to accept responsibility, and Satan is called by our Lord, the Father of Lies. Adam and Eve, after accepting Satan’s principle in the Garden, lied about their guilt. Wherever men are evading responsibility, they are liars. In denying their guilt and responsibility, they affirm the guilt and responsibility of the environment.

Practically, what does this mean? Let’s return to Poncins, whom I quoted on the supposed 6 million. Poncins is a distinguished Frenchman, a Viscount, a dedicated Catholic. He has written a book the thesis of which is that the Church indeed is in a bad situation today, the Catholic Church. But whose fault is it, not the pope’s. Oh! To him it’s unthinkable that anyone should say it’s the fault of the pope or the bishops or the Catholic laity. It is the ugly work of the Jews and the freemasons and other subversive elements. Everyone from the pope down in the Church is white-washed and the guilt is placed elsewhere. This is the sin of Adam. “The woman which Thou gavest to be with me, she did give me and I did eat;” the refusal to accept responsibility, the insistence that it’s someone else. Satan is the father of lies, and the root of lies is the unwillingness to assume responsibility, the desire to escape it.

Liars are like narcotic addicts. Just as an addict has to have a continually larger and larger dosage, so the liar needs a bigger and bigger lie to sustain himself. And as a result, the reality he creates becomes progressively more monstrous.

“These six things doth the Lord hate, yeah seven are an abomination unto Him. A proud look, a lying tongue and hands that shed innocent blood, an heart that devises wicked imaginations, feet that be swift in running to mischief, a false witness that speaketh lies and he that soweth discord among brother.” A liar is more dangerous {?} than a thief. He destroys far more and he lets loose greater lies. A world that makes lying an instrument of State is a world bent on committing suicide and on killing all within range, because it converts its evil imagination into words and its words into murderous acts. Therefore, the Word of the Lord must be seen only as Law. “Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbor.” Unless this be a principle, lies become the principle operation.

The Ninth Commandment
The Lying Tongue
Dr. R.J. Rushdoony

It is very regrettable that Rushdoony has doubts on the scale of the Holocaust: such denialist views, like his loathing of mixed-race marriages, weakens and poisons his witness and his work. Christian Reconstruction would be light-years ahead in worldwide cultural influence and academic influence if we didn’t have to go back and purge this evil from among us.

But such things have sadly happened before: Luther has his own great hatred of the Jews, as did Marx (both race and religious hatred.. and many other forms of hate too!), or J. Gresham Machen, or Murray Rothbard.

Black leaders – in the US and elsewhere – are hardly innocent of antisemitic and/or anti-white and/or misogynist views. It merely isn’t in the interest of the progressive media establishment to pound on this fact at the moment.1

All that being said, his main point — blaming others (yes, even Jews) instead of claiming our own fault and failure and evil and guilt — remains.

Progressive, Race, Wages, and Christ

One day, it may well be politically expedient for Progressives to toss American Blacks under the bus. This shouldn’t be a surprise – numerous Progressives pressed for eugenic control of the Black population, and were quite successful in crippling their economic success with the minimal wage laws and licensing requirements and redlining.

To begin to scratch the surface, see Progressives, Eugenics, Women and the Minimum Wage by Stephen Carson , Minimum Wage, Maximum Discrimination by Caleb Fuller and The Minimum Wage and Progressive Eugenics, Again by Ryan McMaken.

Quoting Ryan McMaken below:

—<Quote begins>—

The minimum wage issue is especially interesting from an economic perspective, since the fact that the minimum wage destroys jobs was once its main selling point. That is, it was designed to destroy jobs for undesirable poor whites and alleged non-white racial inferiors. The whole concept of the “living wage” was once a benchmark used to evaluate the worth of a human being. That is, if you couldn’t earn a living wage, you were ripe for sterilization. The minimum wage was thus a convenient way of weeding out the undesirables from the more valuable human beings. In other words, in pursuit of the Progressive ideal of “racial hygiene,” the minimum wage was a key part of the agenda. 

I covered the topic more here, back in 2014.

But don’t expect this inconvenient history to be a problem for the Progressive movement. Those Progressives weren’t real Progressives, we’ll be told. Peter St. Onge explains in The Affluent Investor this week:

Progressives’ slickest trick is that every time their policies fail they claim “No, that wasn’t ‘real’ Progressivism.”

It’s the “No True Scotsman” fallacy. The fallacy that “your people” would never do something bad and, if they ever do, well those weren’t really your people. “Exculpatory sub-grouping,” in psychologist Aiden Gregg’s phrase.

[…]

We see this fallacy repeatedly from the socialists: it’s never “real” socialism from Stalin, Hitler, Mao, Pol Pot, North Korea, Cuba, or Venezuela. However passionately every one of these regimes believed themselves to be socialist, every time they fail the propagandists write them out of the movement. 

—<Quote ends>—

Christians are not to imitate our Progressive Betters.
We must identify our evil, call it evil, and repent of it.
From true repentance comes true life from the hand of God.

Jesus said “I am the Truth”.

We need to be like Him in moral statue, despite our serious flaws and limitations.
“Be ye therefore perfect, even as your Father who is in heaven is perfect.”
We are not to be liars, as are those whose father is in hell.

One Year Later: No Treatment for COVID

A doctor speaks of the obscene lack of available treatment for COVID-19.

The doctor’s credentials:

Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH, FACP, FACC, FAHA, FCRSA, FCCP, FNKF, FNLA

Professor of Medicine, Texas A & M College of Medicine
Board Certified Internist and Cardiologist
President Cardiorenal Society of America
Editor-in-Chief, Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine
Editor-in-Chief, Cardiorenal Medicine
Senior Associate Editor, American Journal of Cardiology

From a site member of Garynorth.com:

He was absolutely amazed that even to this day, none of the institutions have formalized a treatment for those who get COVID for early intervention. Basically, for the NIH, CDC, AMA: There is *no* treatment. The protocol *to-this-day* is: “don’t treat, send them home. If they reach a point at which they can’t breathe, tell them to go to the hospital.”

You can tell he is flabbergasted as to why the governing institutions, from the start, have been so resistant towards treatment to reduce hospitalizations and deaths. His perspective is that 70%+ of the deaths could have been avoided with early treatment with drugs like hydroxychloroquine, ivermectin, mixed with steroids, antibiotics and anticoagulants. Moreover, he said this treatment resistance is international, not just in the USA.

[snip]

He said that ZERO viral diseases are treated with single drugs. It’s always a combination of drugs to deal with the effects of a virus.

[snip]

He also said that from the start, the risk stratification of COVID was clear: old age and obesity were the two big risk factors. Hence the response should have been to protect the high-risk and let the others live life normally.

[snip]

The red-pill for him: COVID was all about vaccinations, from the start. The lack of treatment protocols were intentional to ensure maximized death count to instill fear and cooperation for the vaccinations.

For now, Christians should keep the possibility of a deliberately maximized death toll as only a hypothetical implication, not as a proven fact.

Start with what we know: after one year, there is NO TREATMENT PROTOCOL from the government medical establishment.

At best, this is rampant incompetence.

“Exactly what are we paying these people for, again?”

“What do you call people…”

… There is this puzzle that I have mentioned before. What do you call people who are weak in their defense of free speech, weak in their defense of freedom of association and weak in their defense of religious liberty (in other words, basic First Amendment rights)?

The answer: I don’t know, but it would be totally inaccurate — considering the history of American political thought — to call these people “liberals.”

Short test for journalists: Label the cultural point of view in this commentary.”
Get Religion

Terry Mattingly asks the question again, more recently:

So I will ask my question again, since this is a crucial issue in journalism these days: “What do you call people who are weak in their defense of free speech, weak in their defense of freedom of association and weak in their defense of religious liberty?” What is the accurate term these days?

The New York Times (#WHOA) probes ACLU’s move away from First Amendment liberalism
Get Religion

The formal term for these people are Progressives.

But I prefer to stress the backing these people get from the power elite that they speak for, with terms like The Establishment, The Better Sort, The Right Sort, Our Betters, The Ruling Class, and The Superiors.

Not because these Progressive ideologues really have any sort of power whatsoever.

But because these Progressives are quite useful to the actual Ruling Class, and so are excellent mouthpieces, providing endless justifications why wealth, liberty and power need to be stripped from the Inferiors, and given to the Superiors.

Every Single Day.

Now and Forever.

Two seconds after the Progressives cease to be useful to the actual elite, everything they wanted and everything they said will be just another forgotten relic, of no more use and no more importance than the Victorians or the Nazis or the Church of England.

But until that day comes, for as long as their ideology serves the interest of the wealthy and the powerful, Progressives will continue to be well-funded, culturally sheltered, and protected by their pleased and satisfied owners.

Loyalties

Quoted from Loyalties by R. J. Rushdoony,
Chalcedon Position Paper No. 62, May 1985

—<Quote begins>—

[Discussion on self-pity, and blaming the Evil Other snipped]

Everyone, however, wants to reform others, especially their enemies. We forget that the greatest menace to community comes from this kind of Phariseeism. It is the essence of Phariseeism to see oneself as superior, and others as the problem people of the world. We miss the whole point of our Lord’s indictment of the Pharisees if we forget that, to a very real degree, they were the best people of their day, and they knew it. Their attitude towards others reflected this. In His biting attack on the Pharisees, our Lord portrays one boasting even to God of his superiority: “God, I thank thee, that I am not as other men are, extortioners, unjust, adulterers, or even as this publican” (Luke 18:11). What the Pharisee did was to separate himself from other men in terms of his ostensibly superior religious stand. Our Lord tells us that the publican was justified before God, not the Pharisee (Luke 18:14).

Let us remember, too, that our Lord declares that the summation of God’s law is in two commandments: “Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind . . . And . . . Thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself” (Matt. 22:37, 39). Not humanistic or social criteria but the love of God must govern all our being. When we love God truly, then we can also love our neighbor as ourselves. Two things are clear in this latter commandment. First, it presupposes that we love ourselves. We can only respect ourselves and have a healthy self-love when we know that we are created in the image of God and redeemed by Jesus Christ. Men who cannot love themselves cannot love others. Much of the failure of various groups, Protestant, Catholic, Jewish, and others, to have the godly respect for groups or persons outside their fellowship that they should is due to a lack of a Biblical view of themselves under God.

God’s repeated test of the integrity of a people’s faith is their care for widows, orphans, and strangers, for those who are outside their normal realm of association. This is the second aspect of this commandment. To love our neighbor as ourselves is to show as great a concern for his or her welfare, rights, and reputation as for our own. To love our neighbor as ourselves means to respect our neighbor’s marriage and its sanctity (“Thou shalt not commit adultery”); his life (“Thou shalt not kill”); his property (“Thou shalt not steal”); his reputation (“Thou shalt not bear false witness”); and to do this in word, thought, and deed (“Thou shalt not covet”).

What this means is very clear. Beyond a very limited sphere, judgment is the province of God. A godless state will assume more and more of the prerogatives of God and assume powers of judgment over all of life. Because we are not God, for us the decisive power in society must be the regenerating power of God and the work of the Holy Spirit in and through us. Not revolution but regeneration, not coercion but conversion, is our way of changing the world and furthering the Kingdom of God. This is the heart of Christian Reconstruction. The heart of Biblical law is that it makes us the basic government of society in and through our personal and family life, through our vocations, churches, and schools. In Biblical law, civil government is a very limited and minor sphere of rule and power.

No society can be healthy if the people are not strong in their faith. A strong state means a weak people. The various civil governments of the world are all strong and overbearing in their power because the peoples are weak in the faith. Statist power grows to fill a vacuum in government created by the irresponsibility of the people. When men say of their Lord, “We will not have this man to reign over us” (Luke 19:14), they are inviting anarchy. The book of Judges describes such a time. Men had rejected God as their king, and, because “In those days there was no king in Israel” God having been denied, “every man did that which was right in his own eyes” (Judg. 21:25).

—<Quote ends>—

Interesting, that the discussion of the rise of the God-State is immediately followed by discussing anarchy.

“Anarcho-tyranny”, anyone?

—<Quote begins>—

If our allegiance is to anything short of the triune God and His Word, our loyalties will be humanistically oriented. We will be overly-governed by groups and institutions, however good, and insufficiently governed by God the Lord. A prominent American political leader, a man of unique independence, once told me that peer pressure governs most politicians. Before their election, they are motivated by what they and their constituency want. After their election, the peer pressure of their new group now governs them, and they are less responsive to the demands of their electorate.

Peer pressure is a most potent force in the modern world because religious faith is by contrast weak and fragile. Indeed, in one church college, group dynamics are taught as an important and worthy source of social strength.

This goes hand in hand with a major shift in man’s outlook which came progressively into force with the Enlightenment. The domain belonging to religion and the church was seen as the inner world, the spiritual life of man. The domain of reason and the state was held to be the material sphere. There is no warrant in Scripture for any such division. All things were made by God the Lord, and all things are subject to His law-word and government. His church must declare God’s Word and its relevance to all the world, the state no less than any other sphere. For the church to be silent in any sphere, or to limit the scope of God’s government, law, and rule is to sin and to deny to that degree its Lord.

We are not therefore to be governed by our parochial loyalties, nor by group dynamics, nor by peer pressure. All our churches, institutions, groups, races, nationalities, and allegiances must be subject to the prior government of the triune God and His law-word. Anything short of that is idolatry.

—<Quote ends>—

Amen, and amen.

Newsflash: The Media Lies

From Yet Another Media Tale — Trump Tear-Gassed Protesters For a Church Photo Op — Collapses by Glenn Greenwald

—<Quote begins>—

For more than a year, it has been consecrated media fact that former President Donald Trump and his White House, on June 1 of last year, directed the U.S. Park Police to use tear gas against peaceful Lafayette Park protesters, all to enable a Trump photo-op in front of St. John’s Church. That this happened was never presented as a possibility or likelihood but as indisputable truth. And it provoked weeks of unmitigated media outrage, presented as one of the most egregious assaults on the democratic order in decades.

[…]

There were some denials of this narrative at the time, largely confined to right-wing media. ABC News mocked “hosts on Fox News, one of the president’s preferred news media outlets, [who] have spent the days since the controversial photo op shifting defenses to fit the president’s narrative.” Meanwhile, The Federalist‘s Mollie Hemingway — in an article retweeted by Trump as a “must read” — cited sources to assert that the entire media narrative was false because force was to clear the Park not to enable Trump’s photo op but rather “because [protesters] had climbed on top of a structure in Lafayette Park that had been burned the prior night” and the Park Police decided to build a barrier to protect it.

But as usual, the self-proclaimed Superior Liberal Truth Squad instantly declared them to be lying. The Washington Post‘s “fact-checker,” Phillip Bump, mocked denials from Trump supporters and right-wing reporters such as Hemingway, proclaiming that a recent statement from the Park Police “brings the debate to a close,” as it proves “the deployment of security forces using weapons and irritants to clear a peaceful protest so that the president could have a photo op.”

[…]

Over and over we see the central truth: the corporate outlets that most loudly and shrilly denounce “disinformation” — to the point of demanding online censorship and de-platforming in the name of combating it — are, in fact, the ones who spread disinformation most frequently and destructively. It is hard to count how many times they have spread major fake stories in the Trump years. For that reason, they have nobody but themselves to blame for the utter collapse in trust and faith on the part of the public, which has rightfully concluded they cannot and should not be believed.

—<Quote ends>—

The media cannot and should not be believed.

That is the key point Christians must keep in mind.

There is a second point: the media is comprehensively against the Christian faith.

The mainstream liberal media openly hates the Christian faith as a rival religion to the God-State, and will show its contempt whenever possible.

The alternative conservative media is more subtle in its hostility, by and large.

From Rushdoony, in the article The Reversal of Standards
(Position Paper No. 119, March 1990):

—<Quote begins>—

The advance of this great reversal of values is expedited by the “conservative” intellectual, churchman or “agnostic.” His perspective is one of a studied rootlessness. He advocates all kinds of “traditional values” without calling attention to their necessary source in Biblical faith. To admit to Christian faith is seen as alien to an intelligent discourse.

The result is a curious one. In the 1920s, an old-fashioned liberal, H. L. Mencken, had a major influence. Mencken, in the name of intellectualism, did little more than attack bitterly Christians and Southerners. (Since Mencken, a curious development has taken place. Southerners who aspire to status as intellectuals routinely damn the South to prove that they are worthy of status.)

Mencken, as an old-fashioned liberal, broke with the New Deal and F. D. Roosevelt. In the 1980s, his fall from liberal grace continued as it became known that he disliked both blacks and Jews!

Mencken’s influence, curiously, is alive and well in conservative circles. Imitation Menckenism gained its first revival in the National Review, then in The American Spectator, and later in Chronicles of Culture. All three are often of great interest; their writers are among the finest, and their issues are usually good reading. Their high quality makes their failure all the more distressing.

They share in a common error: a studied rootlessness. Their thinking is in a vacuum. More than Christianity’s enemies, they simply ignore its existence. The liberal and radical humanists take Christianity seriously and attack it strongly. The latter-day Menckenites act as if it does not exist, or never existed. Some of them are churchmen, but one would never know it to read them.

As a result, their work, often finely honed, witty, and learned, is marked by a curious sterility. By their unwillingness to allow religion into intellectual discourse, they become trivial. Paul Tillich rightly defined religion as “ultimate concern.” The latter-day Menckenites live and think with trivial concerns. They do themselves the gravest injustice, because their studied rootlessness invites a sad description of them: “the intellectual as eunuch.” By ignoring the religious nature of human concerns, they condemn themselves to a life of appearances, to a carefully cultivated irrelevance.

Our liberals and radicals are indeed anti-Christian, but they are religious men, earnest humanists. Too many churchmen are like the Laodiceans described and condemned by our Lord: neither hot nor cold, simply lukewarm (Rev. 3:14–16). And too many conservative intellectuals have become abstracted from reality because of their hostility to the matters of faith; they read sometimes like guests at a Mad Hatter’s tea party.

It is no wonder, then, that a major reversal of morals and standards has long been under way. In the academic world, the disaster is far gone, and a new reign of the dunces prevails. Charles J. Sykes rightly subtitled his ProfScam, “Professors and the Demise of Higher Education” (Regnery Gateway, 1988).

Those who believe that an imaginary pendulum will restore moral standards are assuming that a naturalistic and mechanical factor is always at work. This belief is itself an evidence of the breakdown of standards! Restoration comes through God’s judgment and grace, and man’s faith and work. It begins in us and with us. We put our lives, our faith, our time, and our money on the line. There is no other way. The belief in a mechanical adjustment by a “pendulum” is to believe in a modern fairy tale. Civilizations have routinely perished and disappeared. No society can have standards when men lack them in all their being. Such a society does have a peace — in the grave.

Our Lord and His law-word have been treated with contempt by our culture. God will surely deal with all such men and nations. How will He deal with us?

—<Quote ends>—

There is no pendulum.

Either the people choose to repent… or they choose not to.

(The leaders follow the masses, of course. Just so you know where the modernist hatred of the Christian faith is coming from.)

I will assume that the masses will choose death, and so will die.

We must be the minority, to choose life, and so to shape the future.

And yes, this implies that we will be the future majority. A reasonable assumption, seeing that Our Betters refuse to have children.

This could well change, should Our Betters decide to pull out the machine guns, just as they did in their younger days. However, this is 2021, not 1931: Our Betters just don’t have the kind of vigour, or the control of information, that they used to have.

And they don’t have the millions of disposable, disciplined, eager young men they need to fulfill their dreams, either.

Does Affirmative Action Help Health?

Quote from The ‘kill whites’ psychiatrist and the high price of wokeness in medicine by Kurt Mahlburg

—<Quote begins>—

The case of Dr Norman Wang makes this abundantly clear. Dr Wang is a cardiologist from the University of Pittsburgh who published a paper in the Journal of the American Heart Association (JAHA). His conclusion, after analysing 50 years of data, is that affirmative action and “diversity” initiatives have neither improved patient outcomes nor increased the participation rate of black and Hispanic clinicians in the field of cardiology. On this basis, he argued in his paper that race-neutral policies were the way forward for medicine.

Herzog recounts that at first, Dr Wang’s paper passed largely unnoticed. “But four months after it was published, screenshots of the paper began circulating on Twitter and others in the field began accusing Wang of racism,” she explains. In a classic case of cancel culture, an online mob formed — led by medical professionals — using the hashtag #RetractRacists.

The editor in chief of JAHA ultimately retracted Dr Wang’s piece and issued an apology. But it went even further. The American Heart Association (AHA), which publishes the journal, denounced Dr Wang’s paper in a statement. AHA’s accompanying tweet said that the work of Dr. Wang

does NOT represent AHA values. JAHA is editorially independent but that’s no excuse. We’ll investigate. We’ll do better. We’re invested in helping to build a diverse health care and research community.

Herzog searched out how frequently JAHA has retracted research in the past. She found that it had only occurred in one other case: a paper written in 2019 that linked heart attacks to vaping, where the findings were ultimately exposed as in error. In the case of Dr. Wang’s research, no such errors were found. AHA simply denounced “the views expressed in the article” as “contrary to our organisation’s core values and historic commitment to promoting diversity and inclusion in medicine”.

As MercatorNet’s editor Michael Cook rightly observes, “in the world of medicine, the ability to speak truthfully is quite literally a matter of life and death.” We can whinge about wokeness in many corners of society, but in medicine, it may well end up costing lives far beyond Dr Khilanani’s delusional fantasies.

—<Quote ends>—

The core question for the Woke Medical Mob isn’t

  • “Does this set of government practices and programs actually create the desired results for the Black & Hispanic population?”

The question is

  • “How can we cut off this threat to our financial well-being, and keep the government money flowing?”

This corrupt nonsense isn’t going to end, until the Great Default kicks in and the Flow of Free Stuff to entitled professionals within the medical guild – “The Priesthood who Speak for the Sacred Victims” – ends.

(If you have a suspicion that, for every dollar that goes to a Victim, three dollars go to the Loving Friends of the Victim with a Really Nice House1… you are on the right track.)

As for the Victims? If they were wise, they would no more trust the Smiling Progressive than trust the Smiling Conservative. It was assorted progressive-led segregation policies that systematically put the boots to Black wealth for most of the American Century2 (as described in The Color of Law) and their eagerness to leverage the poor for their own gain – financial and social – continues today.

The Ruling Class isn’t Conservative, after all. It’s Leftist-Liberal, with a useful Conservative echo chamber to say soothing words when the leftist-corporate-statist power structure gets some resistance.

The Body of Christ needs to build up the poor, so they can and do stand on their own two feet, and can help each other out freely, without requiring the Compassionate Care and Concern of Our Betters.

When they are free and able to stand tall with their own people, then we will be free too.


1There is a saying: “Where are the client’s yachts?” Poor black people might want to start nosing around, and uncover the fine lifestyle the Community Organizers enjoy, while the poor blacks stay right where they are, in the ghettos.

2At the time when the US generated the most wealth for the most people – from 1865 to 1965 – Black Americans were systematically and quite deliberately excluded from building any wealth themselves. Sporadically and temperamentally by the lower class conservatives, and systematically and comprehensively by the Ruling Class progressives.

From 1973, US wealth generation has been hammered, by the destruction of the gold standard (opening the door to financial rapes of the common folk by the politically connected people) and by the methodical murder of the future, be it explicitly so with abortion, or with pro-sterility, anti-family policies with divorce and sodomy… and ever-more onerous educational and legal requirements needed for young people to get a steady job and get a family going.

“The more crippled the Young people are, the safer the Elders are.”

As can be easily proven with a four-year university education being of less worth than leaving school at grade eight in 1910. Throw in the union and guild requirements too, and the rampant injustice today is obvious.

Leading to the rampant judgement tomorrow.
(And today, in many ways!)

On Crucified Armenian Girls

A quote from Quora: Someone photographed the crucified Armenian girls. Were any of them subsequently rescued or did they all die?

—<Quote begins>—

Kosmas Aitolos, Loves History, Politics,Science ,Geography etc

There is no genuine photograph of crucified Armenian girls found or publicised so far. You are likely referring to a famous photo of naked ,long -haired Armenian girls crucified in a line along a hilltop. It is a still from a movie made in 1919 in the USA with the help of a female Armenian survivor.

It is however based on facts and it is even worse than shown in the photos. The truth was deemed so depraved and shocking that they chose to show crucifixion as an alternative to what really happened. In fact, the raped girls were impaled up their vaginas in long lines with stakes/mini crosses. If you know anything about impalement , you will know it is extremely slow and it takes days to die in torment and you are thirsty as hell.

Did the Turks crucify Armenians and other Christians? Yes, they did ,but we don’t have photos of it as of yet , but we do have eyewitness accounts from various people.

Did any survive? No, from memory there is no record of any surviving apart from Aurora ,mentioned below.Ravished Armenia – Wikipedia

==============================================================

UPDATE: I had no idea this post would be so looked at. Yes, the truth is very horrible and many including our own governments try to cover it up to allow “normalisation “ to occur. See what the West did with Kemalist Turkey in 1922 and even now with Erdogan.

Anyway,many have said I lie or I am mistaken. No I am not .

Below, just a few instances of the historically -proven depravity of the Turks and Moslems.They both had and have form. See Beheadings and rapes and murders of girls before their fathers’ eyes in Cyprus 1974. All in UN documents.Athanasios Diakos – Wikipedia

Above :A deacon(priest) / general fighting for Greek freedom = Impaled.The Battle of Lepanto: When Turks Skinned Christians Alive for Refusing Islam 

Above: Bragadin the General, in Cyprus ,promised safety for himself and his people. They lied to him = Skinned him alive and stuffed him with straw.Dionysios Skylosophos – Wikipedia

Another preacher /philosopher/ freedom fighter= skinned alive and his skin filled with straw. Named ‘skylosophos ‘by the Turks and their collaborators as ‘ skylo ‘ means a dog in Greek. Ie Dionysus the Dog Philosopher . They were laughing at him and demeaning him as the dog is an unclean /cursed animal in Islam.

Below : Metropolitan Chrysostomos of Smyrna. 1922. Able to escape as the Catholic Archbishop gave him space to flee on a ferryboat if he wanted. Chose to stay to protect his people. Sentenced to Crucifixion by a summary court , he was actually hijacked on the way to execution by the Turkish rabble. They cut off his ears, nose, tongue, two hands and put out both his eyes with bayonets whilst still alive. To add insult to injury they chopped off his head and stuck it on his crutch and paraded it around the town . Has this ever been done to a Moslem leader in Europe within living memory? I think not…

If the Turks did the above to notables why is it so hard to believe that the irregulars and rabble did the same or worse to the above village girls ?Bashi-bazouk – Wikipedia

The truth is always there for those who want to find it…

Natural Selection: It’s Real, but Just Not Strong Enough

Natural selection is the only mechanism that even in principle could mimic the activity of an intelligent agent in creating anything of at least modest complexity and ingenuity. This conclusion is highlighted by the fact that speakers at the conference showcased every conceivable alternative mechanism that could potentially help fill the explanatory deficits of the SEM. But not one shred of evidence was presented that any of the extensions could perform any feat beyond such trivial tasks as increasing a plant’s height, changing the number of digits in an animal’s limb, or performing other slight modifications to preexisting traits. 

The current state of evolution can be compared to the crisis astronomy would face if physicists discovered that gravity stopped operating beyond 10,000 miles past a celestial body. The loss of the only feasible mechanism that could explain the motion of planets, stars, and galaxies would result in absolute pandemonium and despair. 

Most materialist biologists will not so easily come to terms with their true predicament since evolution operates not only as a scientific theory but as a sacrosanct creation narrative for secular society. Nevertheless, with natural selection off the table as a designer substitute, the only sensible interpretation that remains for the overwhelming evidence of design in biological systems is that life is the product of an actual designer (herehere).

Darrel Falk Downplays the Ramifications of the 2016 Royal Society Meeting
by Brian Miller

Natural selection really does exist: but it just isn’t powerful enough to change an amoeba to a dog, or a fleck of moss to a giant sequoia. It simply doesn’t have the power to pull it off, regardless of how many millions and billions of years you give it.

Moreover, Darwin’s hardcore racism and sexism increasingly matters more to the intelligentsia than his hatred of religion and divine law. It’s not that the Ruling Class is getting soft on Christianity – quite the contrary! – but the support of women and coloured people is just more important than their enmity against some powerless, cowering, irrelevant, dead religion.

Furthermore, Fuentes adds “Darwin portrayed Indigenous peoples of the Americas and Australia as less than Europeans in capacity and behavior. Peoples of the African continent were consistently referred to as cognitively depauperate, less capable, and of a lower rank than other races.”[3] Fuentes concludes that Darwin baselessly

asserted evolutionary differences between races. He went beyond simple racial rankings, offering justification of empire and colonialism, and genocide, through “survival of the fittest.” … In “Descent,” Darwin identified women as less capable than (White) men, often akin to the “lower races.” He described man as more courageous, energetic, inventive, and intelligent, invoking natural and sexual selection as justification, despite the lack of concrete data and biological assessment. His adamant assertions about the centrality of male agency and the passivity of the female in evolutionary processes, for humans and across the animal world, resonate with both Victorian and contemporary misogyny….. Darwin was a perceptive scientist whose views on race and sex should have been more influenced by data and his own lived experience. But Darwin’s racist and sexist beliefs, echoing the views of scientific colleagues and his society, were powerful mediators of his perception of reality.[4]

Darwin’s Racism Under Fire
by Jerry Bergman, Ph.D

Now, despite the best efforts of our Ruling Class (on the outside) and the Christian Religious Professionals (on the inside), Christianity is going to do rather well in the 21st century, and (I suspect) spectacularly well in the 22nd century…

…but not in the West (pre-Great Default), and especially not in Western Europe (no matter what, excluding outright cultural miracles).

Moving from Darwin
to the Darwin-Poisoned Western Nations1

I an rather confident that the Americas (excluding Quebec and the Northeast US) will get right with God after Great Default kicks in, and the fake-saviour nation state is bankrupted.

Quebec and the Northeast US – like Western Europe – will continue to despise God no matter what… and so will age out, dry up, and blow away, with outsiders people moving in and inheriting the land.

Just like Western Europe.

Now, if you watch the Prairie States closely, you will know that they are also aging out, regardless of their religiosity or lack thereof.

Pious words are one thing. An actually increasing population, composed of stable families grounded in compassion and a focus on the children, which respects the Laws of God, believes in the work ethic, and has hope for a better future, is something else again.

I think that there will be a low point hit, with a primarily religious core population setting the rock-bottom demographic floor and building up from there. But it can easily take two generations, or even more, before we hit that floor.


1The serpent spoke with Darwin’s mouth: “Dump God, and your race will dominate the world! And your race, alone, will determine what is right and what is wrong, without any misty-magic Divine oversight.”

So the Europeans dumped God, and bent the knee to their flawless genetics (i.e. themselves) as the True God of the World…

…and discovered, 150 years later, after their share of the population fell from 30% to 10% (and still falling), that Satan is a vicious liar.

Who knew? Certainly not the East Asians.

Black Africans had better learn the lesson, and fast: the flattering, fanged snake isn’t done killing yet.